
Ryzen 5 3600

Xeon 6517P
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon 6517P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon 6517P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon 6517P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $996 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- β Delivers 117.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 190W, a 125W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6517P.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6517P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,685 vs 48,810).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6517P
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β192.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6517P better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon 6517P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon 6517P
The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024β2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Xeon 6517P has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P β identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024β2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 β a 93.6% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 72 MB (total)+125% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019β2020) | Granite Rapids (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 48,810+176% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P β the Xeon 6517P supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) β the Xeon 6517P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6517P supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon 6517P came in at $1195. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1195), Ryzen 5 3600 was $996 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P β making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 74% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-83% | $1195 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+118% | 40.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














