
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon 6740P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,451 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 355.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6740P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 90,684).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6740P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon 6740P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,451 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 355.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6740P.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6740P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 90,684).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6740P better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 1097 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 978 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 702 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 902 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 777 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 656 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 425 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon 6740P


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon 6740P
Xeon 6740P
The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740P has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 134.7% lead for the Xeon 6740P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 48 / 96+700% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 288 MB (total)+800% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 90,684+413% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6740P — the Xeon 6740P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the Xeon 6740P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4 TB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | High-density Compute |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($199 vs $4650), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $4451 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 128% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon 6740P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-96% | $4650 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+356% | 19.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












