PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1733NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,849 vs 17,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 79.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 49.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 53W instead of 65W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1733NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌22.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 53W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,849 vs 17,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon D-1733NT?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better fit. You are getting 19.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 79.5% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 49.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1733NT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Xeon D-1733NT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	200 FPS	177 FPS
medium	161 FPS	144 FPS
high	135 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	143 FPS
medium	119 FPS	114 FPS
high	96 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	68 FPS
medium	58 FPS	57 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon D-1733NT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	442 FPS	159 FPS
medium	404 FPS	139 FPS
high	332 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	139 FPS
medium	359 FPS	126 FPS
high	303 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	101 FPS
medium	259 FPS	94 FPS
high	230 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	65 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon D-1733NT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	442 FPS	371 FPS
medium	442 FPS	371 FPS
high	442 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	371 FPS
medium	442 FPS	371 FPS
high	442 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	345 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	371 FPS
medium	361 FPS	322 FPS
high	305 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	220 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon D-1733NT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
1080p
low	442 FPS	371 FPS
medium	442 FPS	371 FPS
high	442 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	371 FPS
medium	442 FPS	371 FPS
high	442 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	371 FPS
medium	442 FPS	371 FPS
high	413 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	309 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon D-1733NT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1733NT

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1733NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 17.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+35%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+113%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	—
PassMark	17,685+19%	14,849
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
Socket	AM4	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon D-1733NT). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon D-1733NT
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon D-1733NT debuted at $300. On MSRP ($199 vs $300), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1733NT — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 56.9% better value option.