Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon D-1746TER

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon D-1746TER

10 Cores20 Thrd67 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 67W, a 2W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1746TER.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1746TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1746TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1746TER

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (15,660 vs 17,685).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon D-1746TER?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1746TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better fit. You are getting 12.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 32.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1746TER is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
1080p
low200 FPS173 FPS
medium161 FPS141 FPS
high135 FPS114 FPS
ultra106 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS143 FPS
medium119 FPS114 FPS
high96 FPS89 FPS
ultra75 FPS71 FPS
4K
low70 FPS67 FPS
medium58 FPS57 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra36 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
1080p
low442 FPS154 FPS
medium404 FPS135 FPS
high332 FPS120 FPS
ultra295 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS135 FPS
medium359 FPS122 FPS
high303 FPS109 FPS
ultra263 FPS87 FPS
4K
low297 FPS98 FPS
medium259 FPS91 FPS
high230 FPS81 FPS
ultra201 FPS63 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
1080p
low442 FPS392 FPS
medium442 FPS392 FPS
high442 FPS392 FPS
ultra442 FPS392 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS392 FPS
medium442 FPS392 FPS
high442 FPS392 FPS
ultra432 FPS344 FPS
4K
low442 FPS392 FPS
medium361 FPS327 FPS
high305 FPS278 FPS
ultra242 FPS223 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
1080p
low442 FPS392 FPS
medium442 FPS392 FPS
high442 FPS392 FPS
ultra442 FPS392 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS392 FPS
medium442 FPS392 FPS
high442 FPS392 FPS
ultra442 FPS392 FPS
4K
low442 FPS392 FPS
medium442 FPS392 FPS
high413 FPS358 FPS
ultra357 FPS309 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1746TER

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon D-1746TER

The Xeon D-1746TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,660 points. Launch price was $1,069.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1746TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1746TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1746TER — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon D-1746TER's 15,660 — a 12.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1746TER.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+35%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+113%
15 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark
17,685+13%
15,660
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
Socket
AM4
FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon D-1746TER). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon D-1746TER
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation