
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon D-1848TER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1848TER.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1848TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-1848TER
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 65W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon D-1848TER
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-1848TER.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 65W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1848TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-1848TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,952 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon D-1848TER?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 308 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1848TER


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon D-1848TER
Xeon D-1848TER
The Xeon D-1848TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,952 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1848TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1848TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1848TER — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon D-1848TER's 16,952 — a 4.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 15360 kB on the Xeon D-1848TER.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+35% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+113% | 15360 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | — |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685+4% | 16,952 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1848TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2227 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon D-1848TER). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-1848TER |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












