
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2752TER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-2752TER.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,074).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2752TER, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-2752TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2752TER
2022Why buy it
- ✅+7.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon D-2752TER
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 77W, a 12W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon D-2752TER.
Why buy it
- ✅+7.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,074).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2752TER, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon D-2752TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌18.5% higher power demand at 77W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon D-2752TER?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-2752TER


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon D-2752TER
Xeon D-2752TER
The Xeon D-2752TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,074 points. Launch price was $1,061.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-2752TER offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-2752TER has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon D-2752TER — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon D-2752TER's 19,074 — a 7.6% lead for the Xeon D-2752TER. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2752TER.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+50% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+100% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 19,074+8% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon D-2752TER). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












