Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1620

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-1620

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1620 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 3600

6 / 12

17,685

+202.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-1620

4 / 8

5,848

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +83.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+220% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Costs $686 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1244.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 6.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $885 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1620, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-1620

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,469 vs 9,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($885 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-1620?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 83.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 173.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in $686 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $885 MSRP, and it still gives you a 83.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1244.9% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 6.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012), 220% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 10 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-1620

The Xeon E5-1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,848 points. Launch price was $313.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-1620 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1620 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-1620's 5,848 — a 100.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 3,469 (93% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 612, a 71.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 2,250 (17% advantage for the Xeon E5-1620). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-1620
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+11%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+220%	10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark	17,685+202%	5,848
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500+174%	3,469
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295+112%	612
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	2,250+19%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1620 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-1620 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1620 supports up to 375 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 193% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 4 (Xeon E5-1620). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 40 (Xeon E5-1620) — the Xeon E5-1620 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and Intel C600,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-1620).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-1620
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+100%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	375 GB+193%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs true (Xeon E5-1620). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-1620
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	true
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E5-1620 came in at $885. On launch pricing ($199 vs $885), Ryzen 5 3600 was $686 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 6.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1620 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 172.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-1620
MSRP	$199-78%	$885
Performance per Dollar	88.9+1247%	6.6
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-1620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.