
Ryzen 5 3600

Xeon E5-1660
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1660 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1660 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +48.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- β Costs $881 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,080 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1053.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,080 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E5-1660
2012Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (8,324 vs 17,685).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,080 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-1660?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-1660 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-1660
The Xeon E5-1660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011β2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,324 points. Launch price was $290.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon E5-1660 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1660 β a 7.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1660 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-1660's 8,324 β a 72% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1660.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+8% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+113% | 15360 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019β2020) | Sandy Bridge-E (2011β2013) |
| PassMark | 17,685+112% | 8,324 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1660 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon E5-1660). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-1660 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | Yes | β |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E5-1660 came in at $1080. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1080), Ryzen 5 3600 was $881 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 7.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1660 β making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 168.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-1660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-82% | $1080 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+1055% | 7.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














