PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +56.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2470 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2470 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2470 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2470 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,701 vs 17,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Xeon E5-2470 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +56.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2470 v2.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2470 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2470 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,701 vs 17,685).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-2470 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2470 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 56.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better fit. You are getting 65.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 56.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013), 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2470 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2470 v2
1080p
low	200 FPS	163 FPS
medium	161 FPS	138 FPS
high	135 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	139 FPS
medium	119 FPS	115 FPS
high	96 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	65 FPS
medium	58 FPS	58 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2470 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2470 v2
1080p
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	404 FPS	268 FPS
high	332 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	193 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	265 FPS
medium	359 FPS	244 FPS
high	303 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	170 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	172 FPS
medium	259 FPS	159 FPS
high	230 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	109 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2470 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2470 v2
1080p
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	442 FPS	268 FPS
high	442 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	442 FPS	268 FPS
high	442 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	268 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	361 FPS	268 FPS
high	305 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	268 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2470 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2470 v2
1080p
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	442 FPS	268 FPS
high	442 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	442 FPS	268 FPS
high	442 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	268 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	268 FPS
medium	442 FPS	268 FPS
high	413 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	268 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2470 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon E5-2470 v2

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-2470 v2

The Xeon E5-2470 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,701 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2470 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2470 v2 — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-2470 v2's 10,701 — a 49.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2470 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2470 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+31%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+28%	25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	17,685+65%	10,701
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2470 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2470 v2
Socket	AM4	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2470 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.