
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2683 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2683 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,686 vs 17,685).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon E5-2683 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2683 v3, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2683 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,686 vs 17,685).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-2683 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon E5-2683 v3


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-2683 v3
Xeon E5-2683 v3
The Xeon E5-2683 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 14,686 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2683 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2683 v3 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-2683 v3's 14,686 — a 18.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 35 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2683 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 35 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 17,685+20% | 14,686 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2683 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2683 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2683 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












