
Ryzen 5 3600

Xeon E5-2686 V3
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2686 V3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2686 V3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2686 V3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $1,301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β Delivers 634.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2686 V3.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 10,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2686 V3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2686 V3
2014Why buy it
- β +5.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-2686 V3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2686 V3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-2686 V3
The Xeon E5-2686 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014β2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 18,148 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2686 V3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads β the Xeon E5-2686 V3 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2686 V3 β a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2686 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014β2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-2686 V3's 18,148 β a 2.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2686 V3. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 10,000 (5.1% advantage for the Xeon E5-2686 V3). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,295 vs 1,033, a 22.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 8,649 (128% advantage for the Xeon E5-2686 V3). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2686 V3.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2686 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 18 / 36+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 45 MB (total)+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019β2020) | Haswell-EP (2014β2015) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 18,148+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 10,000+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295+25% | 1,033 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 8,649+356% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2686 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2686 V3 β the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2686 V3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2686 V3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2686 V3) β the Xeon E5-2686 V3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2686 V3).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2686 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Both support Yes virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2686 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E5-2686 V3 came in at $1500. On launch pricing ($199 vs $1500), Ryzen 5 3600 was $1301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2686 V3 β making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 152.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon E5-2686 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-87% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+635% | 12.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














