PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,759).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,759).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2699A v4 better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699A v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the better fit. You are getting 51.3% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 71.9% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2699A v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon E5-2699A v4 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2699A v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	200 FPS	183 FPS
medium	161 FPS	161 FPS
high	135 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	153 FPS
medium	119 FPS	129 FPS
high	96 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	69 FPS
medium	58 FPS	62 FPS
high	46 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	442 FPS	364 FPS
medium	404 FPS	330 FPS
high	332 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	313 FPS
medium	359 FPS	284 FPS
high	303 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	195 FPS
medium	259 FPS	178 FPS
high	230 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	121 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	442 FPS	669 FPS
medium	442 FPS	669 FPS
high	442 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	647 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	669 FPS
medium	442 FPS	617 FPS
high	442 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	530 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	466 FPS
medium	361 FPS	380 FPS
high	305 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	288 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	442 FPS	669 FPS
medium	442 FPS	669 FPS
high	442 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	663 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	669 FPS
medium	442 FPS	669 FPS
high	442 FPS	637 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	526 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	633 FPS
medium	442 FPS	557 FPS
high	413 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	405 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon E5-2699A v4

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 40.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2699A v4. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	22 / 44+267%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+17%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	55 MB (total)+72%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	17,685	26,759+51%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon E5-2699A v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.