Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 3600

6 / 12

17,685

+70.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4640 v3

12 / 24

10,372

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,660 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,859 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2349.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 3.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,859 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4640 v3.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 7,000).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4640 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+268.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($2,859 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon E5-4640 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4640 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4640 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 268.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in $2,660 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $2,859 MSRP, and it still gives you a 23.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4640 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 268.8% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 2349.6% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 3.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

The Xeon E5-4640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,372 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4640 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon E5-4640 v3's 10,372 — a 52.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 750, a 53.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 7,000 (114.7% advantage for the Xeon E5-4640 v3). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+62%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+89%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+7%	30 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	17,685+71%	10,372
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295+73%	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	7,000+269%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-4640 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 4 (Xeon E5-4640 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 40 (Xeon E5-4640 v3) — the Xeon E5-4640 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C612 (Xeon E5-4640 v3).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+71%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	768 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support Yes virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	Yes
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 came in at $2859. On launch pricing ($199 vs $2859), Ryzen 5 3600 was $2660 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 3.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 184.3% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP	$199-93%	$2859
Performance per Dollar	88.9+2369%	3.6
Release Date	2019	2015

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4640 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.