
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5117
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,087 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 576.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5117, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,897 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,286 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon Gold 5117
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.4% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,087 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 576.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,286 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5117, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,897 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,286 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon Gold 5117?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon Gold 5117


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon Gold 5117
Xeon Gold 5117
The Xeon Gold 5117 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 16,897 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5117 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 5117 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5117 — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5117 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon Gold 5117's 16,897 — a 4.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 5117.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+50% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+66% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 14 MB+2700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,685+5% | 16,897 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5117 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 2400 on the Xeon Gold 5117 — the Xeon Gold 5117 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5117 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5117). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5117) — the Xeon Gold 5117 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C621 (Xeon Gold 5117).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2400+59900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+17476167% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 5117 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5117). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon Gold 5117 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5117 debuted at $1286. On MSRP ($199 vs $1286), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $1087 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5117 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 148.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5117 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-85% | $1286 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+579% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












