
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5222
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 5222.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5222 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5222
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,348 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon Gold 5222
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +81.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon Gold 5222.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5222 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,348 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon Gold 5222?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 87 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon Gold 5222


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon Gold 5222
Xeon Gold 5222
The Xeon Gold 5222 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,348 points. Launch price was $1,221.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5222 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5222 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5222 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon Gold 5222's 9,348 — a 61.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5222.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+8% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB+700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 17,685+89% | 9,348 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5222 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5222). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












