Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon Gold 6150

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6150

18 Cores36 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Costs $3,159 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,358 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1028.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,358 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 26,447).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6150, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon Gold 6150

2017

Why buy it

  • +49.5% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($3,358 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon Gold 6150?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6150 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6150 is the better fit. You are getting 49.5% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is $3,159 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $3,358 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 6150 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 49.5% better PassMark. It is also 1028.4% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 7.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
1080p
low200 FPS182 FPS
medium161 FPS146 FPS
high135 FPS119 FPS
ultra106 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS144 FPS
medium119 FPS114 FPS
high96 FPS91 FPS
ultra75 FPS72 FPS
4K
low70 FPS67 FPS
medium58 FPS56 FPS
high46 FPS45 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
1080p
low442 FPS400 FPS
medium404 FPS346 FPS
high332 FPS291 FPS
ultra295 FPS244 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS346 FPS
medium359 FPS307 FPS
high303 FPS259 FPS
ultra263 FPS216 FPS
4K
low297 FPS225 FPS
medium259 FPS200 FPS
high230 FPS180 FPS
ultra201 FPS148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
1080p
low442 FPS661 FPS
medium442 FPS661 FPS
high442 FPS661 FPS
ultra442 FPS655 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS661 FPS
medium442 FPS612 FPS
high442 FPS580 FPS
ultra432 FPS512 FPS
4K
low442 FPS462 FPS
medium361 FPS361 FPS
high305 FPS322 FPS
ultra242 FPS261 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
1080p
low442 FPS661 FPS
medium442 FPS661 FPS
high442 FPS661 FPS
ultra442 FPS577 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS661 FPS
medium442 FPS598 FPS
high442 FPS516 FPS
ultra442 FPS443 FPS
4K
low442 FPS469 FPS
medium442 FPS421 FPS
high413 FPS377 FPS
ultra357 FPS327 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon Gold 6150

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6150

The Xeon Gold 6150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 26,447 points. Launch price was $3,358.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6150 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6150 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6150 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon Gold 6150's 26,447 — a 39.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6150. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6150.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+14%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+33%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+29%
24.75 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
18 MB+3500%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
17,685
26,447+50%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6150). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6150 debuted at $3358. On MSRP ($199 vs $3358), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $3159 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6150 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 167.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP
$199-94%
$3358
Performance per Dollar
88.9+1025%
7.9
Release Date
2019
2017