
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11855M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon W-11855M
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11855M better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 407 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 181 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 352 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-11855M


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-11855M
Xeon W-11855M
The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-11855M share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,685+1% | 17,462 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-11855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11855M debuted at $450. On MSRP ($199 vs $450), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 78.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-56% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+129% | 38.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












