Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-11855M

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-11855M

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • +77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Costs $251 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 129.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 38.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Xeon W-11855M

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,462 vs 17,685).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-11855M better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-11855M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-11855M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-11855M is 126.1% more expensive on MSRP at $450 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 3600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 129.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 38.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-11855M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low200 FPS249 FPS
medium161 FPS230 FPS
high135 FPS192 FPS
ultra106 FPS165 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS222 FPS
medium119 FPS186 FPS
high96 FPS150 FPS
ultra75 FPS132 FPS
4K
low70 FPS154 FPS
medium58 FPS131 FPS
high46 FPS101 FPS
ultra36 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low442 FPS437 FPS
medium404 FPS403 FPS
high332 FPS335 FPS
ultra295 FPS302 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS407 FPS
medium359 FPS344 FPS
high303 FPS297 FPS
ultra263 FPS259 FPS
4K
low297 FPS269 FPS
medium259 FPS233 FPS
high230 FPS212 FPS
ultra201 FPS181 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low442 FPS437 FPS
medium442 FPS437 FPS
high442 FPS437 FPS
ultra442 FPS383 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS437 FPS
medium442 FPS437 FPS
high442 FPS409 FPS
ultra432 FPS333 FPS
4K
low442 FPS393 FPS
medium361 FPS341 FPS
high305 FPS295 FPS
ultra242 FPS231 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
1080p
low442 FPS437 FPS
medium442 FPS437 FPS
high442 FPS437 FPS
ultra442 FPS437 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS437 FPS
medium442 FPS437 FPS
high442 FPS437 FPS
ultra442 FPS437 FPS
4K
low442 FPS437 FPS
medium442 FPS437 FPS
high413 FPS410 FPS
ultra357 FPS352 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-11855M

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon W-11855M

The Xeon W-11855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,462 points. Launch price was $450.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-11855M share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-11855M — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11855M (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-11855M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-11855M's 17,462 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11855M.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz+17%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+12%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+78%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
10 nm SuperFin
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark
17,685+1%
17,462
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11855M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-11855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11855M debuted at $450. On MSRP ($199 vs $450), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 38.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11855M — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 78.4% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-11855M
MSRP
$199-56%
$450
Performance per Dollar
88.9+129%
38.8
Release Date
2019
2021