
Ryzen 5 3600

Xeon W-11955M
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-11955M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-11955M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-11955M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $424 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 155.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-11955M.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 21,702).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-11955M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-11955M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-11955M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 20.4% lead for the Xeon W-11955M. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+33% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+40860% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 21,702+23% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-11955M). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon W-11955M came in at $623. On launch pricing ($199 vs $623), Ryzen 5 3600 was $424 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 87.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-68% | $623 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+155% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














