
Ryzen 5 3600

Xeon W-1350
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-1350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-1350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 73.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 9,104).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-1350
2021Why buy it
- ✅+379.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon W-1350?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-1350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-1350
The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-1350 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 5.8% lead for the Xeon W-1350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 2,140, a 49.2% lead for the Xeon W-1350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 9,104 (131% advantage for the Xeon W-1350). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 18,742+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | 2,140+65% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 9,104+380% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon W-1350 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support Yes virtualization. The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics P750 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon W-1350 came in at $255. On launch pricing ($199 vs $255), Ryzen 5 3600 was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 73.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 18.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-22% | $255 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+21% | 73.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














