Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-1350P

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-1350P

6 Cores12 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Costs $112 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
  • Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 63.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,611).

Xeon W-1350P

2021

Why buy it

  • +10.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon W-1350P?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1350P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1350P is the better fit. You are getting 10.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 3600 is $112 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $311 MSRP, and it gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-1350P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 10.9% better PassMark. It is also 40.9% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 63.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-1350P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
1080p
low200 FPS261 FPS
medium161 FPS239 FPS
high135 FPS199 FPS
ultra106 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS227 FPS
medium119 FPS189 FPS
high96 FPS153 FPS
ultra75 FPS134 FPS
4K
low70 FPS156 FPS
medium58 FPS130 FPS
high46 FPS100 FPS
ultra36 FPS88 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
1080p
low442 FPS326 FPS
medium404 FPS274 FPS
high332 FPS250 FPS
ultra295 FPS225 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS290 FPS
medium359 FPS245 FPS
high303 FPS225 FPS
ultra263 FPS201 FPS
4K
low297 FPS226 FPS
medium259 FPS194 FPS
high230 FPS182 FPS
ultra201 FPS148 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
1080p
low442 FPS490 FPS
medium442 FPS490 FPS
high442 FPS449 FPS
ultra442 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS490 FPS
medium442 FPS475 FPS
high442 FPS403 FPS
ultra432 FPS351 FPS
4K
low442 FPS391 FPS
medium361 FPS345 FPS
high305 FPS302 FPS
ultra242 FPS252 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
1080p
low442 FPS490 FPS
medium442 FPS490 FPS
high442 FPS490 FPS
ultra442 FPS490 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS490 FPS
medium442 FPS490 FPS
high442 FPS490 FPS
ultra442 FPS490 FPS
4K
low442 FPS490 FPS
medium442 FPS490 FPS
high413 FPS490 FPS
ultra357 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-1350P

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-1350P share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1350P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-1350P's 19,611 — a 10.3% lead for the Xeon W-1350P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350P.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
5.1 GHz+21%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+167%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark
17,685
19,611+11%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
Socket
AM4
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-1350P). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1350P debuted at $311. On MSRP ($199 vs $311), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 63.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350P — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 34% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-1350P
MSRP
$199-36%
$311
Performance per Dollar
88.9+41%
63.1
Release Date
2019
2021