
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2140B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2140B, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon W-2140B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,319 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon W-2140B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2140B, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,319 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon W-2140B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 154 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 304 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 399 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-2140B


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-2140B
Xeon W-2140B
The Xeon W-2140B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 17,319 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2140B offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-2140B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2140B — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-2140B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-2140B's 17,319 — a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2140B.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+191% | 11 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,685+2% | 17,319 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2140B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-2140B). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2140B debuted at $294. On MSRP ($199 vs $294), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 58.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2140B — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 40.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2140B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-32% | $294 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+51% | 58.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












