Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-2175

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-2175

14 Cores28 Thrd140 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • +66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
  • Costs $1,748 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
  • Delivers 636.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 23,507).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon W-2175

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,947 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2175 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2175 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2175 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 40 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2175 is the better fit. You are getting 32.9% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-2175 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-2175 is 878.4% more expensive on MSRP at $1,947 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 636.1% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
1080p
low200 FPS167 FPS
medium161 FPS147 FPS
high135 FPS119 FPS
ultra106 FPS97 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS139 FPS
medium119 FPS118 FPS
high96 FPS96 FPS
ultra75 FPS79 FPS
4K
low70 FPS73 FPS
medium58 FPS67 FPS
high46 FPS53 FPS
ultra36 FPS41 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
1080p
low442 FPS430 FPS
medium404 FPS380 FPS
high332 FPS329 FPS
ultra295 FPS298 FPS
1440p
low420 FPS378 FPS
medium359 FPS339 FPS
high303 FPS294 FPS
ultra263 FPS257 FPS
4K
low297 FPS245 FPS
medium259 FPS219 FPS
high230 FPS204 FPS
ultra201 FPS178 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
1080p
low442 FPS588 FPS
medium442 FPS588 FPS
high442 FPS588 FPS
ultra442 FPS588 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS588 FPS
medium442 FPS588 FPS
high442 FPS588 FPS
ultra432 FPS567 FPS
4K
low442 FPS511 FPS
medium361 FPS426 FPS
high305 FPS383 FPS
ultra242 FPS317 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
1080p
low442 FPS588 FPS
medium442 FPS588 FPS
high442 FPS588 FPS
ultra442 FPS588 FPS
1440p
low442 FPS588 FPS
medium442 FPS588 FPS
high442 FPS588 FPS
ultra442 FPS557 FPS
4K
low442 FPS588 FPS
medium442 FPS554 FPS
high413 FPS485 FPS
ultra357 FPS410 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-2175

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon W-2175

The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2175 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 28.3% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+44%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+66%
19.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
17,685
23,507+33%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
Socket
AM4
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-2175). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2175 debuted at $1947. On MSRP ($199 vs $1947), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $1748 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2175 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 152.2% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 5 3600Xeon W-2175
MSRP
$199-90%
$1947
Performance per Dollar
88.9+635%
12.1
Release Date
2019
2017