
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2245
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2245.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,422).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2245, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon W-2245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-2245
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon W-2245
2019Why buy it
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-2245.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 19,422).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2245, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon W-2245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2245 better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-2245


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-2245
Xeon W-2245
The Xeon W-2245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,422 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2245 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-2245 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-2245 — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2245 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-2245's 19,422 — a 9.4% lead for the Xeon W-2245. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-2245.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 19,422+10% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2245 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon W-2245). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












