
Ryzen 5 3600

Xeon W-3175X
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 477.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-3175X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 31,350).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3175X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3175X better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-3175X
The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 89.1% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 31,350 (107% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 1,467, a 12.5% lead for the Xeon W-3175X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 17,358 (160.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 28 / 56+367% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 38.5 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 46,125+161% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | 31,350+230% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | 1,467+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | 17,358+815% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($199 vs $2999), Ryzen 5 3600 was $2800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 141% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-93% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+477% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














