PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $4,803 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1460.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-3245M.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 18,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $4,803 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1460.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon W-3245M.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.7% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 18,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3245M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.7% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the better fit. You are getting 94.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-3245M is 2413.6% more expensive on MSRP at $5,002 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 17.7% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 1460.1% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3245M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 6/12 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 3600 Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3245M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	200 FPS	185 FPS
medium	161 FPS	150 FPS
high	135 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	148 FPS
medium	119 FPS	117 FPS
high	96 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	82 FPS
medium	58 FPS	70 FPS
high	46 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	44 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon W-3245M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	442 FPS	531 FPS
medium	404 FPS	447 FPS
high	332 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	420 FPS	461 FPS
medium	359 FPS	399 FPS
high	303 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	297 FPS	287 FPS
medium	259 FPS	248 FPS
high	230 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	199 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon W-3245M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	442 FPS	712 FPS
medium	442 FPS	712 FPS
high	442 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	712 FPS
medium	442 FPS	712 FPS
high	442 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	432 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	524 FPS
medium	361 FPS	428 FPS
high	305 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	314 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon W-3245M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	442 FPS	712 FPS
medium	442 FPS	712 FPS
high	442 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	442 FPS	712 FPS
medium	442 FPS	712 FPS
high	442 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	646 FPS
medium	442 FPS	566 FPS
high	413 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 3600 Open Xeon W-3245M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon W-3245M

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245M (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 46.8% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,500 vs 18,500 (64.3% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 1,474, a 12.9% lead for the Xeon W-3245M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 11,572 (143.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.6 GHz+10%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+45%	22 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	16 MB+3100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	17,685	28,494+61%
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	18,500+95%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	1,474+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	11,572+510%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3245M debuted at $5002. On MSRP ($199 vs $5002), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $4803 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245M — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 175.9% better value option.