
Ryzen 5 3600
Popular choices:

Xeon w3-2425
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,776).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2425
2023Why buy it
- ✅+6.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Xeon w3-2425
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+6.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 18,776).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon w3-2425?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 166 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 413 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon w3-2425


Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon w3-2425
Xeon w3-2425
The Xeon w3-2425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,776 points. Launch price was $529.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon w3-2425 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon w3-2425 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2425 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon w3-2425's 18,776 — a 6% lead for the Xeon w3-2425. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 15 MB on the Xeon w3-2425.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+113% | 15 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 17,685 | 18,776+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,295 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) / not specified (Xeon w3-2425). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Gaming/Budget Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 3600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon w3-2425 debuted at $529. On MSRP ($199 vs $529), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $330 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 35.5 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2425 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 85.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 3600 | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-62% | $529 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9+150% | 35.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












