Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon X5687

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon X5687

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.86 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon X5687 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 3600

6 / 12

17,685

+228.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon X5687

4 / 8

5,386

0.0%

Core i7-5600U

Pentium Dual Core T3200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +86.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $353 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 810.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $552 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 5,386).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.

Xeon X5687

2011

Why buy it

✅+183.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($552 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Xeon X5687?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5687 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5687 is the stronger fit. You are getting 183.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in $353 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 86.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X5687 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 183.8% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 810.8% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon X5687 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 8.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon X5687 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 3600 scores 17,685 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 106.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,295 vs 1,643, a 23.7% lead for the Xeon X5687 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 5,386 (95.8% advantage for the Xeon X5687). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+9%	3.86 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+167%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Matisse (2019−2020)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	17,685+228%	5,386
Cinebench R23 Multi	9,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,295	1,643+27%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,898	5,386+184%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 3600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5687 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5687 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 125% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 3 (Xeon X5687). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) vs 36 (Xeon X5687) — the Xeon X5687 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600) and X58 (Xeon X5687).

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon X5687
Socket	AM4	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+140%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	288 GB+125%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	36+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Ryzen 5 3600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5687). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation, Xeon X5687 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon X5687
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming/Budget Workstation	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 3600 was priced at $199, while the Xeon X5687 came in at $552. On launch pricing ($199 vs $552), Ryzen 5 3600 was $353 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 3600 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon X5687 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 160.4% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 3600	Xeon X5687
MSRP	$199-64%	$552
Performance per Dollar	88.9+807%	9.8
Release Date	2019	2011

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5687 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.