Ryzen 5 4600GE vs Xeon E5-2660 v4

Ryzen 5 4600GE vs Xeon E5-2660 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 4600GE

6 / 12

15,889

+1.5%

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 7900X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2660 v4

14 / 28

15,650

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 4600GE vs Xeon E5-2660 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 4600GE vs Xeon E5-2660 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 4600GE

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 7, while Xeon E5-2660 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2660 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2660 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+337.5% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,650 vs 15,889).
❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 4600GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 4600GE better than Xeon E5-2660 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2660 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 4600GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 4600GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 4600GE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2660 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (79.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 4600GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 4600GE vs Xeon E5-2660 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 4600GE

The Ryzen 5 4600GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2660 v4

The Xeon E5-2660 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,650 points. Launch price was $1,445.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 4600GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v4 — a 27% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 4600GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 4600GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 4600GE scores 15,889 against the Xeon E5-2660 v4's 15,650 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600GE vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2660 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon E5-2660 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	14 / 28+133%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+31%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	35 MB+338%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	3.5 MB+600%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Renoir (2020−2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	15,889+2%	15,650
Cinebench R23 Multi	7,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 4600GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 4600GE	Xeon E5-2660 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-2660 v4). The Ryzen 5 4600GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7), while the Xeon E5-2660 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.