
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 22,373).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 22,373).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 164 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 411 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,373 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U's 22,373 — a 3.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,550 | 22,373+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Ryzen 5 PRO 8640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












