PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 385 across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 16,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 385 across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,077 vs 16,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max 385 better than Ryzen 5 5600?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 22.5% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data, 49% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 49.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.5% more average FPS across 9 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better fit. You are getting 49% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max 385 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.5% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max 385 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	161 FPS	257 FPS
medium	130 FPS	234 FPS
high	112 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	222 FPS
medium	113 FPS	183 FPS
high	95 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	154 FPS
medium	69 FPS	127 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	86 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	508 FPS	592 FPS
medium	419 FPS	500 FPS
high	351 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	346 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	508 FPS
medium	375 FPS	452 FPS
high	323 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	303 FPS
medium	268 FPS	273 FPS
high	243 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	209 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	539 FPS	780 FPS
medium	526 FPS	611 FPS
high	483 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	676 FPS
medium	434 FPS	534 FPS
high	396 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	476 FPS
medium	298 FPS	394 FPS
high	255 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	288 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen AI Max 385

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	539 FPS	807 FPS
medium	539 FPS	807 FPS
high	539 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	700 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	796 FPS
medium	539 FPS	706 FPS
high	539 FPS	619 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	536 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	554 FPS
medium	448 FPS	499 FPS
high	398 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	389 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Ryzen AI Max 385

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI Max 385 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 39.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 16,500 (39.3% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 2,800, a 30.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 14,000 (47.8% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	21,550	32,274+50%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	16,500+49%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	2,800+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	14,000+63%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max 385) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket	AM4	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5x-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.