Ryzen 5 5600 vs Xeon E5-2673 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2673 v2.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,331 vs 21,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Xeon E5-2673 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2673 v2.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,331 vs 21,550).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon E5-2673 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2673 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.9% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 5600 is the better fit. You are getting 74.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600 is at an unclear MSRP at $199 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 24.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2673 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2673 v2
1080p
low	161 FPS	179 FPS
medium	130 FPS	143 FPS
high	112 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	145 FPS
medium	113 FPS	114 FPS
high	95 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	67 FPS
medium	69 FPS	56 FPS
high	55 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2673 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2673 v2
1080p
low	508 FPS	308 FPS
medium	419 FPS	308 FPS
high	351 FPS	292 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	308 FPS
medium	375 FPS	308 FPS
high	323 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	217 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	226 FPS
medium	268 FPS	201 FPS
high	243 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	148 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2673 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2673 v2
1080p
low	539 FPS	308 FPS
medium	526 FPS	308 FPS
high	483 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	308 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	308 FPS
medium	434 FPS	308 FPS
high	396 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	308 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	308 FPS
medium	298 FPS	308 FPS
high	255 FPS	302 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	243 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2673 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2673 v2
1080p
low	539 FPS	308 FPS
medium	539 FPS	308 FPS
high	539 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	308 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	308 FPS
medium	539 FPS	308 FPS
high	539 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	308 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	308 FPS
medium	448 FPS	308 FPS
high	398 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	308 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2673 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E5-2673 v2

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2673 v2

The Xeon E5-2673 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,331 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 v2 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 is built on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E5-2673 v2's 12,331 — a 54.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2673 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2673 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+28%	25 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	21,550+75%	12,331
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2673 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.