PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,503 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1112.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,600 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+39.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Ryzen 5 5600

2022

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,503 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1112.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Why buy it

✅+39.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,600 vs 12,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5600 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2679 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 39.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 5600 is $2,503 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2679 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 39.5% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 1112.6% better value on MSRP (108.3 vs 8.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 5600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2679 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	161 FPS	182 FPS
medium	130 FPS	160 FPS
high	112 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	151 FPS
medium	113 FPS	127 FPS
high	95 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	70 FPS
medium	69 FPS	62 FPS
high	55 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	508 FPS	364 FPS
medium	419 FPS	331 FPS
high	351 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	224 FPS
1440p
low	447 FPS	313 FPS
medium	375 FPS	284 FPS
high	323 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	313 FPS	195 FPS
medium	268 FPS	178 FPS
high	243 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	120 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	539 FPS	603 FPS
medium	526 FPS	603 FPS
high	483 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	603 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	603 FPS
medium	434 FPS	590 FPS
high	396 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	505 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	447 FPS
medium	298 FPS	363 FPS
high	255 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	274 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
1080p
low	539 FPS	603 FPS
medium	539 FPS	603 FPS
high	539 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	539 FPS	585 FPS
1440p
low	539 FPS	603 FPS
medium	539 FPS	603 FPS
high	539 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	462 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	528 FPS
medium	448 FPS	472 FPS
high	398 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	359 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600 Open Xeon E5-2679 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon E5-2679 v4

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 11.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 1,000, a 68.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 12,000 (33% advantage for the Xeon E5-2679 v4). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	20 / 40+233%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+33%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+40%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	50 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	5 MB+900%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (2020−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,550	24,131+12%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,077	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,052+105%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,600	12,000+40%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2679 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2679 v4). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2679 v4) — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2679 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Socket	AM4	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 debuted at $2702. On MSRP ($199 vs $2702), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $2503 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 169.5% better value option.