
Ryzen 5 5600
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2133
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $418 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 429.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 20.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2133, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-2133
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,000 vs 11,077).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Xeon W-2133
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ✅Costs $418 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 429.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 20.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2133, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (6,000 vs 11,077).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Xeon W-2133?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 310 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 251 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 539 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 315 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon W-2133


Ryzen 5 5600
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2133
Xeon W-2133
The Xeon W-2133 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $617.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 5600 and Xeon W-2133 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-2133 — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-2133 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 21,550 against the Xeon W-2133's 12,615 — a 52.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,077 vs 6,000 (59.5% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,052 vs 1,292, a 45.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,600 vs 6,647 (25.6% advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600 vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2133.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+288% | 8.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 21,550+71% | 12,615 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,077+85% | 6,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,052+59% | 1,292 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,600+29% | 6,647 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2133 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-2133 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 4 (Xeon W-2133). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) vs 48 (Xeon W-2133) — the Xeon W-2133 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600) and C422 (Xeon W-2133).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2133 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2133). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop, Xeon W-2133 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2133 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2133 debuted at $617. On MSRP ($199 vs $617), the Ryzen 5 5600 is $418 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600 delivers 108.3 pts/$ vs 20.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2133 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 136.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600 | Xeon W-2133 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-68% | $617 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+431% | 20.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












