Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon D-1733NT

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon D-1733NT Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 5625U

6 / 12

14,717

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-1733NT

8 / 16

14,849

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon D-1733NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon D-1733NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 5625U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 53W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,717 vs 14,849).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1733NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon D-1733NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5625U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 5625U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌253.3% higher power demand at 53W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1733NT better than Ryzen 5 5625U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 5625U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1733NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1733NT is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1733NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 5625U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (49.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1733NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon D-1733NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 5625U

The Ryzen 5 5625U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,717 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1733NT

The Xeon D-1733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,849 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5625U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-1733NT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5625U versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1733NT — a 32.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5625U (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5625U is built on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5625U scores 14,717 against the Xeon D-1733NT's 14,849 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon D-1733NT. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5625U vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1733NT.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5625U	Xeon D-1733NT
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+39%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+7%	15 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023)	—
PassMark	14,717	14,849

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5625U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1733NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.