Ryzen 5 6600HS vs Ryzen 9 4900HS

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 6600HS

2022

Why buy it

  • +1% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 4900HS

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Ryzen 5 6600HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,793 vs 18,975).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 4900HS is ahead with a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600HS pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 6600HS also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600HS is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 6600HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 6600HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 6600HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of FP6, 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
1080p
low167 FPS173 FPS
medium145 FPS141 FPS
high117 FPS112 FPS
ultra98 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS149 FPS
medium122 FPS119 FPS
high98 FPS95 FPS
ultra82 FPS77 FPS
4K
low79 FPS81 FPS
medium72 FPS70 FPS
high57 FPS55 FPS
ultra45 FPS43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
1080p
low353 FPS353 FPS
medium294 FPS293 FPS
high259 FPS258 FPS
ultra228 FPS225 FPS
1440p
low306 FPS303 FPS
medium259 FPS260 FPS
high235 FPS233 FPS
ultra203 FPS198 FPS
4K
low227 FPS246 FPS
medium196 FPS218 FPS
high179 FPS197 FPS
ultra146 FPS171 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
1080p
low474 FPS470 FPS
medium457 FPS470 FPS
high414 FPS470 FPS
ultra344 FPS470 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS470 FPS
medium400 FPS470 FPS
high360 FPS468 FPS
ultra301 FPS415 FPS
4K
low340 FPS461 FPS
medium284 FPS391 FPS
high246 FPS343 FPS
ultra193 FPS281 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
1080p
low474 FPS470 FPS
medium474 FPS470 FPS
high474 FPS470 FPS
ultra474 FPS470 FPS
1440p
low474 FPS470 FPS
medium474 FPS470 FPS
high474 FPS470 FPS
ultra474 FPS429 FPS
4K
low474 FPS458 FPS
medium471 FPS415 FPS
high420 FPS363 FPS
ultra364 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 9 4900HS

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900HS

The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 6600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 18,975 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.

FeatureRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+5%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+10%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+100%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
6 nm-14%
7 nm
Architecture
Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Renoir (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
18,975
18,793
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
Socket
FP7
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 6600HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureRyzen 5 6600HSRyzen 9 4900HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Vega 8
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End