
Ryzen 5 6600HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 4900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Ryzen 5 6600HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,793 vs 18,975).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 6600HS
2022Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Ryzen 5 6600HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 4900HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,793 vs 18,975).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600HS and Ryzen 9 4900HS


Ryzen 5 6600HS
Ryzen 5 6600HS
The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS
The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 6600HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 4900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 4900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600HS scores 18,975 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+5% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+10% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-14% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 18,975 | 18,793 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 6600HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 6600HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600HS | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












