Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 7533HS

6 / 12

15,231

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4667 v3

16 / 32

15,397

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7533HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4667 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,231 vs 15,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $128 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7533HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4667 v3 better than Ryzen 5 7533HS?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7533HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-4667 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $128 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7533HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 7533HS

The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7533HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7533HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 15,231 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7533HS vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7533HS	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+52%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	6 nm-73%	22 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,231	15,397+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.