
Ryzen 5 7533HS
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5115
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5115 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5115, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon Gold 5115
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,017 vs 15,231).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7533HS
2024Xeon Gold 5115
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5115 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5115, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,017 vs 15,231).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7533HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7533HS better than Xeon Gold 5115?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 337 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7533HS and Xeon Gold 5115


Ryzen 5 7533HS
Ryzen 5 7533HS
The Ryzen 5 7533HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Setembro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 15,231 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 5115
Xeon Gold 5115
The Xeon Gold 5115 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB. L2 cache: 10 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,017 points. Launch price was $1,221.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7533HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5115 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 5115 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7533HS versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5115 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7533HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5115 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 15,231 against the Xeon Gold 5115's 15,017 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 7533HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7533HS vs 13.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 5115.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+38% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+38% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+16% | 13.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 10 MB+1900% |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 15,231+1% | 15,017 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5115 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7533HS | Xeon Gold 5115 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












