
Ryzen 5 7535H
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4309Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4309Y across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4309Y, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon Silver 4309Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,718 vs 18,832).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 7535H
2023Xeon Silver 4309Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4309Y across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4309Y, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,718 vs 18,832).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7535H better than Xeon Silver 4309Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon Silver 4309Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon Silver 4309Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 107 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon Silver 4309Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon Silver 4309Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7535H and Xeon Silver 4309Y


Ryzen 5 7535H
Ryzen 5 7535H
The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4309Y
Xeon Silver 4309Y
The Xeon Silver 4309Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 18,718 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7535H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4309Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4309Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4309Y — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535H (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535H scores 18,832 against the Xeon Silver 4309Y's 18,718 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7535H. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535H vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4309Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon Silver 4309Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.55 GHz+26% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+18% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 6 nm-40% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 18,832 | 18,718 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4309Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7535H | Xeon Silver 4309Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












