Ryzen 5 7535H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4

AMD

Ryzen 5 7535H

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.55 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2682 v4

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016

Ryzen 5 7535H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 7535H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 7535H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 7535H

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2682 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (18,832 vs 18,971).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2682 v4, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon E5-2682 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
  • ❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7535H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2682 v4 better than Ryzen 5 7535H?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2682 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7535H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2682 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2682 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2682 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2682 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 7535H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 7535H vs Xeon E5-2682 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 5 7535H

The Ryzen 5 7535H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.55 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 18,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E5-2682 v4

The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,971 points. Launch price was $800.

⚑

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7535H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β€” the Xeon E5-2682 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.55 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7535H versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2682 v4 β€” a 58.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7535H. The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the Rembrandt-R (2023βˆ’2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses Broadwell (2015βˆ’2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7535H scores 18,832 against the Xeon E5-2682 v4's 18,971 β€” a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2682 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7535H vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2682 v4.

FeatureRyzen 5 7535HXeon E5-2682 v4
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock
4.55 GHz+82%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
β€”
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
40 MB+150%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+12700%
4 MB
Process
6 nm-57%
14 nm
Architecture
Rembrandt-R (2023βˆ’2025)
Broadwell (2015βˆ’2019)
PassMark
18,832
18,971
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7535H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2682 v4 uses FCLGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 7535HXeon E5-2682 v4
Socket
FP7
FCLGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0