
Ryzen 5 7540U
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V2748
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7540U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Embedded V2748
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7540U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,607).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7540U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Ryzen 5 7540U
2023Ryzen Embedded V2748
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7540U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,434 vs 18,607).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7540U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7540U better than Ryzen Embedded V2748?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7540U | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7540U | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7540U | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7540U | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 335 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7540U and Ryzen Embedded V2748


Ryzen 5 7540U
Ryzen 5 7540U
The Ryzen 5 7540U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,607 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Embedded V2748
Ryzen Embedded V2748
The Ryzen Embedded V2748 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,434 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7540U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V2748 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7540U versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2748 — a 14.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7540U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7540U uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7540U scores 18,607 against the Ryzen Embedded V2748's 18,434 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 7540U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7540U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2748.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7540U | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+15% | 4.25 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+10% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 18,607 | 18,434 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7540U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7540U | Ryzen Embedded V2748 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












