Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 5 7540U

Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 5 7540U Performance Spectrum

Core i9-11900T

8 / 16

18,620

+0.1%

Xeon W-2225

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

18,607

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 5 7540U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 5 7540U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900T

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 750, while Ryzen 5 7540U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 5 7540U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $439 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7540U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7540U moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7540U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,607 vs 18,620).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-11900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-11900T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900T better than Ryzen 5 7540U?

Yes. Core i9-11900T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-11900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11900T is the better buy right now. Core i9-11900T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $439 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7540U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 5 7540U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900T

The Core i9-11900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,620 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 7540U

The Ryzen 5 7540U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,607 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7540U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-11900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900T versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7540U — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-11900T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7540U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900T scores 18,620 against the Ryzen 5 7540U's 18,607 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-11900T. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i9-11900T	Ryzen 5 7540U
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+113%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	18,620	18,607
Geekbench 6 Single	2,100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7540U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-11900T	Ryzen 5 7540U
Socket	LGA1200	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900T) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7540U). The Core i9-11900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 750), while the Ryzen 5 7540U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-11900T targets Low Power High Perf Desktop.