PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900T vs Xeon W-1350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900T vs Xeon W-1350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900T

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 73.5 PassMark/$ ($439 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $184 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $439 MSRP).
✅Delivers 73.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.5 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $439 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,104 vs 9,200).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900T better than Xeon W-1350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-11900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-11900T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11900T is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1350 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-11900T comes in 72.2% more expensive on MSRP at $439 MSRP versus $255 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-1350 is also 73.3% better value on MSRP (73.5 vs 42.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-11900T vs Xeon W-1350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900T

The Core i9-11900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,620 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-11900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900T versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-11900T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900T scores 18,620 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-1350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,100 vs 2,140, a 1.9% lead for the Xeon W-1350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,200 vs 9,104 (1% advantage for the Core i9-11900T). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900T vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.

Feature	Core i9-11900T	Xeon W-1350
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.3 GHz+120%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+33%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	18,620	18,742
Geekbench 6 Single	2,100	2,140+2%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,200+1%	9,104

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-11900T) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).

Feature	Core i9-11900T	Xeon W-1350
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900T) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 750 (Core i9-11900T) and UHD Graphics P750 (Xeon W-1350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-11900T targets Low Power High Perf Desktop.

Feature	Core i9-11900T	Xeon W-1350
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 750	UHD Graphics P750
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Low Power High Perf Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-11900T was priced at $439, while the Xeon W-1350 came in at $255. On launch pricing ($439 vs $255), Xeon W-1350 was $184 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-11900T delivers 42.4 pts/$ vs 73.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350 — making the Xeon W-1350 the 53.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-11900T	Xeon W-1350
MSRP	$439	$255-42%
Performance per Dollar	42.4	73.5+73%
Release Date	2021	2021

Search Core i9-11900T on Amazon

Search Xeon W-1350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.