
Core 5 210H

Core i9-11900T
Core 5 210H vs Core i9-11900T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 210H vs Core i9-11900T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 210H vs Core i9-11900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 210H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,602 vs 18,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-11900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-11900T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 750, while Core 5 210H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $439 MSRP, while Core 5 210H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core 5 210H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900T better than Core 5 210H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 210H vs Core i9-11900T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 210H
The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

Core i9-11900T
The Core i9-11900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,620 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, matching the Core i9-11900T's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900T — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900T (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-11900T uses Rocket Lake (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Core i9-11900T's 18,620 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-11900T. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900T.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 12 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+47% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Rocket Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 18,602 | 18,620 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,200 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-11900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 210H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900T). The Core i9-11900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 750), while the Core 5 210H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-11900T targets Low Power High Perf Desktop.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Core i9-11900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Low Power High Perf Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













