Core 5 210H
VS
Ryzen 5 220

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Core 5 210H

8 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 5 210H

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
102%
#149
Core 5 210H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
96%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
94%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 220

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
114%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
107%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 5 220 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 5 210H in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 5 210HRyzen 5 220
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 5 210HRyzen 5 220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 210H and Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Core 5 210H

The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 210H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Ryzen 5 220's 18,762 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220.

FeatureCore 5 210HRyzen 5 220
Cores / Threads
8 / 12+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
18,602
18,762
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 5 210HRyzen 5 220
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 210H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core 5 210H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.

FeatureCore 5 210HRyzen 5 220
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin and Light Laptop