Core 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 220

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 220 Performance Spectrum

Core 5 210H

8 / 12

18,602

0.0%

Core i7-9750HF

Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition

18,762

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 5 210H

2024

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (18,602 vs 18,762).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 220 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 220

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (14 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 740M, while Core 5 210H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core 5 210H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 220 better than Core 5 210H?

Yes. Ryzen 5 220 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 220 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 220 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (125.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 210H

The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 210H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Ryzen 5 220's 18,762 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 220. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220.

Feature	Core 5 210H	Ryzen 5 220
Cores / Threads	8 / 12+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.2 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	18,602	18,762
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,700

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 5 210H	Ryzen 5 220
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	14

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 210H) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core 5 210H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.