Core i9-11900T
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-11900T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,620 vs 18,793).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $439 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-11900T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900T better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-11900T vs Ryzen 9 4900HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-11900T
The Core i9-11900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,620 points. Launch price was $299.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-11900T and Ryzen 9 4900HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900T versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-11900T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900T scores 18,620 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 4900HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900T vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.
| Feature | Core i9-11900T | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+14% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 18,620 | 18,793 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,100 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-11900T versus LPDDR4-4266 on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — the Ryzen 9 4900HS supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-11900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-11900T) vs 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) — the Core i9-11900T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i9-11900T | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR4-4266+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i9-11900T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 750 (Core i9-11900T) and Vega 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-11900T targets Low Power High Perf Desktop, Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Core i9-11900T | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Low Power High Perf Desktop | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-11900T and Ryzen 9 4900HS
