Ryzen 5 8640HS
VS
Core Ultra 7 268V

Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Core Ultra 7 268V

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 5 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 268V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
104%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
102%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
96%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
95%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
92%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 7 268V leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 5 8640HS is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen 5 8640HSCore Ultra 7 268V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 5 8640HSCore Ultra 7 268V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640HS and Core Ultra 7 268V

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 268V

The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 268V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 268V (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 268V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Core Ultra 7 268V's 19,698 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 268V.

FeatureRyzen 5 8640HSCore Ultra 7 268V
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 8+33%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz
5 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+59%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)+33%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
19,851
19,698
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,653
Geekbench 6 Single
2,437
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 268V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 5 8640HSCore Ultra 7 268V
Socket
FP8
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 8640HS) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Ryzen 5 8640HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.

FeatureRyzen 5 8640HSCore Ultra 7 268V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Productivity