Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Xeon E7-4830

Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Xeon E7-4830 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 8640HS

6 / 12

19,851

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E7-4830

8 / 16

19,981

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Xeon E7-4830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Xeon E7-4830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1567 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,851 vs 19,981).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4830, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E7-4830

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1567, while Ryzen 5 8640HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 8640HS better than Xeon E7-4830?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4830 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 8640HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 8640HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 8640HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 8640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1567. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Xeon E7-4830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,851 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-4830 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E7-4830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640HS versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 — a 68.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses Westmere-EX (2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 19,851 against the Xeon E7-4830's 19,981 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E7-4830. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-4830.

Feature	Ryzen 5 8640HS	Xeon E7-4830
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+104%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+64%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-88%	32 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	Westmere-EX (2011)
PassMark	19,851	19,981
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,696
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,382

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 8640HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-4830 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.