Ryzen 5 9600X
Xeon Gold 6248
Ryzen 5 9600X vs Xeon Gold 6248 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 9600X vs Xeon Gold 6248 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 9600X vs Xeon Gold 6248: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 9600X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon Gold 6248 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 19,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $279 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6248 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6248
2019Why buy it
- ✅+8.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅71.4% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 9600X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 9600X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 9600X can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 9600X better than Xeon Gold 6248?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 9600X vs Xeon Gold 6248 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 5 9600X
The Ryzen 5 9600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,003 points. Launch price was $279.
Xeon Gold 6248
The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 9600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 9600X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 9600X (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 9600X uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 9600X scores 30,003 against the Xeon Gold 6248's 29,535 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 9600X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 19,000 (8.2% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,300 vs 1,327, a 85.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 9600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 15,277 (1.8% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 9600X vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 9600X | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 20 / 40+233% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+38% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+56% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1900% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,003+2% | 29,535 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | 19,000+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,300+149% | 1,327 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | 15,277+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 9600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 5 9600X versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 — the Ryzen 5 9600X supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 9600X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 9600X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) — the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X870E,X870,X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 5 9600X) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6248).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 9600X | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+91% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 9600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 9600X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248). The Ryzen 5 9600X includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon Gold 6248 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 9600X targets Gaming, Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 9600X rivals Intel Core i5-14600K; Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 9600X | Xeon Gold 6248 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | General Purpose Enterprise Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 9600X and Xeon Gold 6248
