
Core i9-14901E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 9600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14901E
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,894 vs 3,300).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,262 vs 15,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 107.5 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 9600X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $278 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 107.5 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($279 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-14901E
2024Ryzen 5 9600X
2024Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $278 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 107.5 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($279 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,894 vs 3,300).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,262 vs 15,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 107.5 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 9600X better than Core i9-14901E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 677 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 549 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 395 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 207 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 653 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 724 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 757 FPS | 750 FPS |
| ultra | 729 FPS | 750 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 757 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 750 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 656 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 629 FPS | 577 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 499 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 399 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14901E and Ryzen 5 9600X

Core i9-14901E
Core i9-14901E
The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 5 9600X
Ryzen 5 9600X
The Ryzen 5 9600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,003 points. Launch price was $279.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 9600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-14901E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 9600X — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 9600X uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the Ryzen 5 9600X's 30,003 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,894 vs 3,300, a 13.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 9600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,262 vs 15,000 (5% advantage for the Ryzen 5 9600X). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+4% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 30,298 | 30,003 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,894 | 3,300+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,262 | 15,000+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 9600X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 28 (Ryzen 5 9600X) — the Ryzen 5 9600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and X870E,X870,X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 5 9600X).
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 9600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-14901E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 9600X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14901E) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 9600X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 9600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 9600X rivals Intel Core i5-14600K.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14901E launched at $557 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 9600X debuted at $279. On MSRP ($557 vs $279), the Ryzen 5 9600X is $278 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14901E delivers 54.4 pts/$ vs 107.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 9600X — making the Ryzen 5 9600X the 65.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | Ryzen 5 9600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $557 | $279-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4 | 107.5+98% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












