PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-12700F vs Core i9-14901E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-12700F vs Core i9-14901E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-12700F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $243 less on MSRP ($314 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Delivers 77.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.6 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($314 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Laminar RM1), unlike Core i9-14901E.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,388 vs 2,894).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,448 vs 14,262).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-14901E

2024

Why buy it

✅+21.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-12700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.4 vs 96.6 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $314 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-12700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14901E better than Core i7-12700F?

Yes. Core i9-14901E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 14.6% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14901E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14901E is the stronger fit. You are getting 14.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14901E is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-12700F is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-14901E comes in 77.4% more expensive on MSRP at $557 MSRP versus $314 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-12700F is also 77.6% better value on MSRP (96.6 vs 54.4 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14901E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 44% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-12700F vs Core i9-14901E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-12700F

The Core i7-12700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,332 points. Launch price was $386.

Core i9-14901E

The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700F packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-14901E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-12700F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-12700F versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-12700F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700F scores 30,332 against the Core i9-14901E's 30,298 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-12700F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,388 vs 2,894, a 19.2% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,448 vs 14,262 (13.6% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E.

Feature	Core i7-12700F	Core i9-14901E
Cores / Threads	12 / 20+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.6 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+44%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	30,332	30,298
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,388	2,894+21%
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,448	14,262+15%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-12700F versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E — the Core i9-14901E supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14901E supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700F) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E).

Feature	Core i7-12700F	Core i9-14901E
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-12700F) vs Yes (Core i9-14901E). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-12700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12700F targets High-performance Gaming / Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700F rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	Core i7-12700F	Core i9-14901E
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	Yes
Target Use	High-performance Gaming / Productivity	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-12700F was priced at $314, while the Core i9-14901E came in at $557. On launch pricing ($314 vs $557), Core i7-12700F was $243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700F delivers 96.6 pts/$ vs 54.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-14901E — making the Core i7-12700F the 55.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-12700F	Core i9-14901E
MSRP	$314-44%	$557
Performance per Dollar	96.6+78%	54.4
Release Date	2022	2024

Search Core i7-12700F on Amazon

Search Core i9-14901E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.